So you think that the FSF have the wrong angle on this one? You're saying that DRM is fundamentally ethically neutral, it's just the use cases that have been pu

So you think that the FSF have the wrong angle on this one? You're saying that DRM is fundamentally ethically neutral, it's just the use cases that have been put forward have been broadly user hostile. To continue, there's nothing to stop "good guys" from using DRM in a benevolent way to secure their rights. So if your reading of this is correct then the FSF should not be waging war on DRM per se but on the many and varied freedom and user -hostile implementations of DRM - this is a harder sell I guess but the distinction is an important one.