4 ms·
This is not an acceptable solution as a plan. It is, instead, a terrible hack to deal with expected error. Better yet is to plan for errors to be exceptional th
by pnathan 13y ago
This is not an acceptable solution as a plan. It is, instead, a terrible hack to deal with expected error. Better yet is to plan for errors to be exceptional things.
git bills itself as the stupid content tracker. It's much better to add a small amount of smarts to ensure that you and your friends don't have to reach in the trash and get the changesets you erroneously deleted.
- Skinney 13y agoLike histedit, mq and rebase in hg does you mean? And it's not an error that the user tells git (s)he wants to remove or squash or whatever some commits. Git gives you that flexibility, which alot of people like, and at the same time gives users an undo-history in case they mess up. On the other hand, I've used the reflog once in the last four months. For me, the use of reflog really has been exceptional.