5 ms·
Everpix was one of the best $5/month I spent. I would have been willing to spend far more for their services. I wish they would have tried to bump the price up
by hospadam 13y ago
Everpix was one of the best $5/month I spent. I would have been willing to spend far more for their services. I wish they would have tried to bump the price up to save the service. Having one place for all my photos made me exceptionally happy. Even my wife absolutely loved Everpix.
I guess I need to find an alternative... what are they?
- toomuchtodo 13y agohttps://www.dropbox.com/features/photos https://www.dropbox.com/features/photos https://trovebox.com/ https://trovebox.com/ https://loom.com/ https://loom.com/ http://www.smugmug.com/ http://www.smugmug.com/ and of course, http://www.flickr.com/ http://www.flickr.com/
- cschmidt 13y agoalso http://www.zenfolio.com/ http://www.zenfolio.com/
- tombot 13y agoWill just say for anyone that never used Everpix that flickr, zenfolio and smugmug don't really do the same job. Yes they all host photos, but the whole point is that it's an automated process, imports from multiple sources and does magic like de-duplication.
- hnriot 13y agosounds exactly like zenfolio, flickr etc. They all supposer set and forget and they all do duplicate detection. If they didn't and everpix had a real value proposition they might still be going.
- hospadam 13y agoOne of the key features of Everpix was the "set and forget" capability. Also their dupe-detection was really good. Do any of those do that? I guess Dropbox is the most established... I'd hate to be in this same situation in a year from now with Loom...
- derstang 13y agoI think Loom does.
- Ilmesnkie_Jones 13y agoEvery time a startup I like fails I find myself less and less likely to use another one. Everpix was really really easy and I would have been happy to pay double what I was for it, its a real shame to see it shut down.
- dirtyaura 13y agoThe problem with Dropbox is that photos are eating space on my local hard drive, unless I manually manage them. Everpix was perfect from the syncing perspective. Sharing could have been improved and I think they should have put more effort to private sharing experience and that would have helped with growth too.
- suchire 13y agoYou can selectively unsync particular folders in your Dropbox Advanced Preferences; that's what I do with my Camera Uploads folder.
- rsl7 13y agoThat still presents the problem of frequent uploads: you have to sync a folder on your hard drive, and then follow up with unsync when it gets too large, and then set up a new folder for the next batch.
- Numberwang 13y agoDropbox would be ridiculously expensive to host photos with. Not a valid option.
- toomuchtodo 13y agoI'm sorry, I must have missed the link to the requirements document.
- nloui 13y agoI just rejoined Thislife.com, now part of Shutterfly. For Smugmug lovers, I also created Smugsync which will sync iPhoto to Smugmug => smugsync.net
- acomjean 13y agoFor what its worth Flickr gives you 1 TB for free now. Thats what I'm using. I have friends that are happy with the smugmug app that uploads to a private album..
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- omfg 13y agohttp://www.picturelife.com http://www.picturelife.com seems the most similar.
- timcederman 13y agobackblaze.com
- kansas 13y agouse Tonido (http://www.tonido.com http://www.tonido.com)
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- jzzskijj 13y agoI wish they would have tried to bump the price up to save the service. The bump would have to been at least something like tenfold to solve anything. According to the article they were -$2,294,818.17 south at the end and their subscription revenue was only $254,060.57. I'm quite confident that would have eaten their 12.4 percent conversion ratio badly.