4 ms·
I'd suggest you re-read the review. She only points to one inaccuracy -- the timeframe when Bezos read Remains of the Day. Stone has acknowledged and corrected
by barretts 13y ago
I'd suggest you re-read the review. She only points to one inaccuracy -- the timeframe when Bezos read Remains of the Day. Stone has acknowledged and corrected that fact for future editions.
Everything else she says is subjective. She thinks Stone portrayed Amazon as a cutthroat, sinister culture; she tries to re-frame it as an Edenic workplace. The truth is probably somewhere in between, but her version is certainly not a fact.
- unreal37 13y agoI think the other argument she makes is that the book is filled with "Bezos worried about..." and "Bezos believed this...". How can the author make such a claim if they didn't interview Bezos? And no mention of having a source claim this. I am sure most of these thoughts and feelings attributed to Bezos are fictional.