I don't really get the logic of this part of the article: * Eating a food that's flavourful and familiar => your body says 'stock up' => you eat more. * Swall

I don't really get the logic of this part of the article: * Eating a food that's flavourful and familiar => your body says 'stock up' => you eat more. * Swallowing unflavoured oil between meals => you gain calories but do not trip the 'stock up' trigger * Roberts could eat whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted, and felt less hungry. Yet, if he's eating the same familiar, flavourful foods, surely he's tripping the mechanism at mealtimes and ingesting extra calories between meals, meaning he should gain weight? If there's an additional logical step in the reasoning, i.e. eating oil makes your stomach full so you eat less, it should really have been mentioned. (Before I'm told to Google it, I'm sure further literature on the diet explains the full logic; my point is that the article doesn't.)