4 ms·
I feel Mercurial's commands are more intuitive than Git's, especially to former SVN users. Functionally, they're so similar it doesn't matter. This is why I l
by rsobers 13y ago
I feel Mercurial's commands are more intuitive than Git's, especially to former SVN users. Functionally, they're so similar it doesn't matter. This is why I love Kiln Harmony--I can work on a Git team and use Mercurial. Kind of like I can work on a dev team that uses Emacs while I use Vim. It shouldn't matter.
- arunc 13y agoI am totally with you on this, albeit kiln harmony is only available for managed hosting.
- Skinney 13y agoKiln Harmony was awesome, as I'm one of two developers in a team of eigth who prefers Git instead of Hg. Then we decided to use sub-repoes/submodules, and kiln harmony can't handle that, and our other team members simply WONT use git :(
- twic 13y agoI work in a company that uses Git, plus Subversion for legacy stuff. I use Mercurial with hg-git and hgsubversion. There are occasional hiccups, but they mostly work like a charm. I'm happy because i get to use Mercurial, and my colleagues are happy because they have someone who can help them out by running complex revset queries!