3 ms·
I read 'old' as 'middle ages old'. There was a time when torture was openly acknowledged as acceptable practice. At least nowadays it's widely recognized as a B
by potatolicious 13y ago
I read 'old' as 'middle ages old'. There was a time when torture was openly acknowledged as acceptable practice. At least nowadays it's widely recognized as a Bad Thing, even if governments are willing to engage in it under the radar.
- pstuart 13y agoWhich is supported by the administrations' insistence on calling it "enhanced interrogation". Newspeak FTW.
- baddox 13y agoI question whether torture is widely recognized as a bad thing. I'm pretty sure I have seen US politicians openly acknowledge that we should torture for national security matters. But even if we assume that, the question remains: why should people believe that torture is less widespread than it was in the Middle Ages?
- jlgreco 13y agoTo clarify, are you actually asking why should they, or why do they?
- dragonwriter 13y agoThe Convention Against Torture exists, and most extent countries (including the US) have ratified it, which seems to represent a fairly wide recognition that torture is a bad thing, even if politicians often will assert exceptions of convenience as to why the general rule should not apply to specific situations.