>totally agreed. though I hope you meant that in a completely non-sarcastic way. :-) (because I know there's a vein here on HN that believes every positional cl

>totally agreed. though I hope you meant that in a completely non-sarcastic way. :-) (because I know there's a vein here on HN that believes every positional claim must be backed by some scientific paper.) I was being serious, and it might humor you a bit when I tell you there are numerous "scientific papers" that back the effectiveness of heuristics (google heuristics case study to find some).