4 ms·
I looked at the sample output (http://www.mos6581.org/files/intro_template.pdf http://www.mos6581.org/files/intro_template.pdf) and is it just me or does the ve
by sanskritabelt 13y ago
I looked at the sample output (http://www.mos6581.org/files/intro_template.pdf http://www.mos6581.org/files/intro_template.pdf) and is it just me or does the vertical spacing seem off? (for example, look at the tables and how the text goes right up to kiss the horizontal bars).
- acqq 13y agoTo me the sample output doesn't produce any aesthetic pleasure at the moment, I can't imagine using it even for the simplest material, provided I can choose between LaTeX and it. I hope it will improve. The title is definitely misleading: "modern LaTeX" it still isn't.
- username223 13y agoWow, that really is hideous, e.g. the table at the beginning of section III. I wish this guy the best, but TeX was written by a very smart and utterly obsessive man, and typography is an ancient and complex field. I doubt this will work out.
- rhythmvs 13y agoUnless the guy gets help from a typographer. Knuth sought assistance from Hermann Zapf. That proved a fantastic duo.
- microtherion 13y agoYeah, I think I’ll stick with the “dated look” of LaTeX documents for now.
- brechtm 13y agoNote that this is a WIP version; you should not judge RinohType on the basis of the example documents for now. I hope you'll understand that at this point I'm focusing on functionality, not on style. The table rendering got messed up when I rewrote the line spacing code. Fixing the table rendering would just require an adjustment of the table style definition.
- username223 13y ago"you should not judge RinohType on the basis of the example documents for now. I hope you'll understand that at this point I'm focusing on functionality, not on style." Then please be more honest. It's not "A modern LaTeX in 6500 lines of Python" -- it's 6500 lines of Python implementing a typesetting language with vastly inferior to TeX, or even Microsoft Word. It may have a syntax more comfortable to Python or Ruby programmers. Just say what you've done.
- chrismorgan 13y agoFor me, using PDF.js in Firefox for Android, it looks even worse; most of the text is garbled junk characters (only code blocks appear correctly). It's substituting characters and using a different font which PDF.js could not load. (Another renderer is displaying it correctly.) Using character substitution as a standard technique is a really bad idea, and is the only thing that is preventing me from taking a deeper look at it with a view to using it as a backend for a play script/musical/opera libretti format that I wrote; it makes the document inaccessible to things like screen readers and prevents ready copying of text and search. Is there a good reason why substitution is used? If you're willing/compliant to the notion of removing it, I'd probably be pleased to help out with the project. (This script format tool I wrote is also written in Python, and at present I'm writing to HTML and using wkhtmltopdf to produce a PDF, but that tool is making a mess of the text kerning so that the final result isn't as much of a pleasure to read from as it should be; your tool, however, is producing what are in my eyes quite nice-looking documents---I can easily overlook minor spacing issues at this comparatively early stage.)