4 ms·
I am always suprised that people are not concerned about this: Linus @ https://lwn.net/Articles/572706/ https://lwn.net/Articles/572706/ "But the fact that I'
by sz4kerto 13y ago
I am always suprised that people are not concerned about this:
Linus @ https://lwn.net/Articles/572706/ https://lwn.net/Articles/572706/
"But the fact that I'm going to be (effectively) off-line next week
means that I'm not opening the merge window for 3.13 yet - since I
won't have the bandwidth to really do merges anyway.
That doesn't mean that you can't send me pull request for the merge
window early, of course - maintainers can always send their pull
requests early rather than late, if they have everything lined up and
ready. But if you have some feature that still wants polishing, you
basically get a free week to do that.
So the two-week merge window for 3.13 will start a week from now. You
have an extra week. But that also means that I will be doubly
disappointed in anybody who then leaves their merge request until the
end of that two-week merge window."
Linus is in absolute control of the kernel development -- this works quite well, but if he gets sick or whatever then how quickly and well will the community find a substitute?
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- SEMW 13y agoThere's a good discussion of 'what if Linus gets hit by a bus?' in the comments of http://lwn.net/Articles/393694/ http://lwn.net/Articles/393694/ [On the scalability of Linus].
- pdw 13y agoDon't forget the segfault.org classic: "What If Linus Torvalds Gets Hit By A Bus?" - An Empirical Study http://segfault.org/writing/segfault.org/Bus.html http://segfault.org/writing/segfault.org/Bus.html
- zimbatm 13y agoFrom what I saw and of the other core committers could take over his job. If Linus is not merging things, commits are probably just piling up on the repos of the respective subsystem responsible persons.
- qwerta 13y agoHow many people download and compile sources directly from kernel.org?
- antocv 13y agoi do. whats the big deal about that?