3 ms·
Really? Your argument is from WSJ? That proves that the invisible hand of the market can work this out? I knew libertarianism was sort of naive but surely you j
by dinkumthinkum 13y ago
Really? Your argument is from WSJ? That proves that the invisible hand of the market can work this out? I knew libertarianism was sort of naive but surely you jest ... WSJ is hardly known for scientific rigor. I mean this is hard to take seriously. I don't know where to begin.
How good would the article be if we were in a time that people may freely be as racist as they want and there were not any social stigmas in the majority about being racist and such racism was commonplace? You would have widespread discrimination and your silly little wouldn't solve anything about it. For those playing at home, this was the status quo in the US at one point. You may argue, as libertarians may, that this is all perfectly fine and is the "moral" way but as usual, with your view of "freedom" we would not have a world many would want to live in.
- pdonis 13y agoYour argument is from WSJ? No, the article that started this thread was from the WSJ, and I was asking a question about it, not endorsing it. Please read before knee-jerk reacting.