If he rigged the system the way you say, I'll be angry on your behalf. With that said, I'll nitpick: Paul Graham can respond to your post however he wants. He

If he rigged the system the way you say, I'll be angry on your behalf. With that said, I'll nitpick: Paul Graham can respond to your post however he wants. He _could_ simply say, "I don't care." You _want_ an apology because you _think_ you've been wronged. A blog post entitled, "I want an apology from Paul Graham" sounds whiny--I get it. Still, from where I'm sitting the title, even with the "probably" proviso, sounds like a power-grab that denies Paul Graham's ability to give whatever response he wants to you. Also it looks linkbaity to me[1]. [1] I dislike linkbaity titles. I don't deny their effectiveness; I clicked the link! disclaimer: I teach public speaking professionally, so these kinds of less-than-explicitly-conscious word choices stick out to me. Edited to emphasize that I agree with the spirit of his post, and that I'm nitpicking because I enjoy picking nits.