2 ms·
It is disturbing that a city of 50,000 would need something like this. In any case, all the advocates of the system claim is that it "lets you know when and wh
by corresation 13y ago
It is disturbing that a city of 50,000 would need something like this.
In any case, all the advocates of the system claim is that it "lets you know when and where a gunshot occurs". That's it. I see no one claiming more, yet can appreciate how knowledge when and where a gunshot occurs can be useful to law enforcement.
- Wingman4l7 13y ago> It is disturbing that a city of 50,000 would need something like this. It's sad that a police department of a city of 50,000 is using the purchase of such a system to justify their budget.