3 ms·
I've reached the point this year where I've concluded that the correlation between "bad client/employer" and "low pay" is so high that I treat that correlation
by mkramlich 13y ago
I've reached the point this year where I've concluded that the correlation between "bad client/employer" and "low pay" is so high that I treat that correlation as 100% and immediately rule-out such parties upfront before risking investing my time/energy into them. The correlation has not been 100%, but close to it. In actual practice.
(And by the way: fuck theory and fuck words. I only look at what happens in directly observed and touchable reality anymore.)
- billmalarky 13y ago"(And by the way: fuck theory and fuck words. I only look at what happens in directly observed and touchable reality anymore.)" Heuristics have been shown to be highly effective.
- mkramlich 13y agototally agreed. though I hope you meant that in a completely non-sarcastic way. :-) (because I know there's a vein here on HN that believes every positional claim must be backed by some scientific paper.) there are many negative things to getting older. but one good thing is you accumulate a larger set of direct RL observations and experiences, out of which you can see certain patterns, some good, some bad, and certain correlations. Treating these correlations as black-or-white indicators can potentially be bad if it closes you off to opportunities. But it can also close you off to bad experiences. You might lose on the small/near-term but you win more in the aggregate and in the long run, playing the odds to your benefit.
- billmalarky 13y ago>totally agreed. though I hope you meant that in a completely non-sarcastic way. :-) (because I know there's a vein here on HN that believes every positional claim must be backed by some scientific paper.) I was being serious, and it might humor you a bit when I tell you there are numerous "scientific papers" that back the effectiveness of heuristics (google heuristics case study to find some).