>The developer bears at least a little responsibility for submitting a bid that is too low to cover successfully completing the project. I didn't say he doesn'

>The developer bears at least a little responsibility for submitting a bid that is too low to cover successfully completing the project. I didn't say he doesn't. The guy talked the developer down to an $800 fee, and then his interpretation of the agreement was the developer should take his feedback into account after the code was submitted to him ("I figured some graphics changes would be OK. Basically, the overlay graphics are slightly different. Same functionality"). That's definitely a self-serving interpretation. Clearly the dev does not want to do anything more than he absolutely needs to do. For that amount of money, he wants to knock-out an app in minimal time and move on. So I'm saying they both nickel-and-dimed each other. I'm not judging, but that's what happened, and I have slightly more empathy for the developer in this case.