3 ms·
I did not take this as an anti-science article, but as an article critical of how academic science/engineering has become hype driven. Perhaps it was always hyp
by kghose 13y ago
I did not take this as an anti-science article, but as an article critical of how academic science/engineering has become hype driven. Perhaps it was always hype driven, but I find it to be particularly bad now. Before you could do 'regular' work i.e. work which was scholarly and did not have terms like 'first to show' and which did not appear in the tabloids 'Science' and 'Nature' and still advance your career and get funding. Not so much any more.