5 ms·
That's an insane choice. Do you really value raw lifespan over quality of life?
by bolder88 13y ago
That's an insane choice. Do you really value raw lifespan over quality of life?
- asadlionpk 13y agoso you would risk having cancer for internet access? Does internet define your quality of life?
- bolder88 13y agoOf course it does. I use the internet to generate money.
- jbrooksuk 13y agoSo do I, but if the pills make me healthy enough to go and do work elsewhere, then so be it.
- icebraining 13y agoBut are you not healthy enough? The situation didn't involve actually having cancer, just a risk of developing it.
- bolder88 13y agoSounds to me like you have an irrational fear of cancer and/or death.
- nzp 13y agoHaving cancer tends to negatively affect one's quality of life. ;) But it's an interesting question--quality of life vs. lifespan. Imagine if there was no possibility of prolonging human lifespan, but instead we had the means to stop aging, say in a person's mid twenties to mid thirties. Having some 50 or 60 years time with your mental and physical faculties in prime, not having to rush, being able to take your time and learn and do practically everything you want. We would live like gods.