4 ms·
> What sense could it possibly make? -You have some property and you're letting someone use it for a fee This is the extraordinarily naive libertarian position
by hansjorg 13y ago
> What sense could it possibly make? -You have some property and you're letting someone use it for a fee
This is the extraordinarily naive libertarian position. Most people would not welcome a brothel as their closest neighbor for example.
- faster 13y agoFunny that you should mention that. My next door neighbor put herself through nursing school on her back, and by renting her place to others in the same profession when she was at school. They were far quieter and less disruptive than the aging couple on the other side of my place. If it had been put up for a vote, I probably would have voted 'no', but the reality was not what I would have expected. This of course is not relevant to the discussion, where someone bought a condo which requires accepting the declaration, bylaws and rules and regulations of the HOA. If those rules, which the buyer accepted, forbid short-term rentals, then there's no excuse for doing it anyway.
- anoncowherd 13y ago>> This is the extraordinarily naive libertarian position. Most people would not welcome a brothel as their closest neighbor for example. That's different from just renting out your place to some random traveller. Besides, even if renting your place is legal, nothing prevents you from whipping up a contract that places some limits on how rowdy the occupant(s) can get. So no, there's nothing "naive" about thinking that renting out your property being illegal is fucking insane.