Personally I think this is related to the reason why zero comments is BAD. You need to have comments that express the intent of your code so that future develop

Personally I think this is related to the reason why zero comments is BAD. You need to have comments that express the intent of your code so that future developers, who are reading your code, can compare your expressed intent with the actual code that is executed. Names of things are just a special kind of comment. So this is just a special case where a clean coder would have compared the intent and the code, and realized that the commment/name needs to be changed to match the change in intent. It's like the old British sailing ships that Horatio Hornblower sailed on. The master gave an order, the first mate repeated that order, the second shouted that order and so on, until one of the navvies translated the order into colorful language that a lady would blush at. Just as we need to express our code in two different ways for the main codebase and the test codebase, we also need to express our intent in two different ways. One way is a complete set of comments and great names, and the other way is in the code itself.