3 ms·
If the satellite imaging is good enough, it's probably cheaper to just have complete coverage. GPS was like 20 billion? a billion in ongoing costs? If i unders
by jfoutz 13y ago
If the satellite imaging is good enough, it's probably cheaper to just have complete coverage. GPS was like 20 billion? a billion in ongoing costs?
If i understand correctly, a new jet is a trillion dollars.
Perhaps the imaging isn't good enough, cloud cover or whatever, but a whole bunch of satellites seems like a far simpler solution.
- FineSight 13y agoOr... You could monitor sub-atomic particles(WIMPs) in real-time.