> You're trading one monopoly for another. Considering it doesn't exist yet, you cannot really call it a monopoly. Thanks for confirming that you consider Comc

> You're trading one monopoly for another. Considering it doesn't exist yet, you cannot really call it a monopoly. Thanks for confirming that you consider Comcast one though. > even though time and time again government does a piss-poor job when given control. You are correct there, the government's control over internet service has enabled a few mammoth carriers to become monopoly's of their realm. Be it for 'national security' interests like AT&T or be it piles of lobbyist money from Comcast. The end result is no competition amongst peers. The only thing coming close would be companies that lease off of Comcast trying to sell packages at a lower cost. This of course doesn't last long since AT&T Comcast and others worked out exactly how to kill leased operators at will subsidizing rates in areas leasers operate to remove any profit potential from the competition that was forced to buy from Comcast anyways. But complain about an operator that doesn't exist yet like it is a monopoly. Blame them for things they have not done yet. Try to push forward the fantasy that Comcast has a quality of service beyond destroying other quality services.