3 ms·
See my reply elsewhere in this thread [1] concerning a new less-forgiving approach we've adopted to glitches/errors. It's not the most polite way to run the pr
by bhauer 13y ago
See my reply elsewhere in this thread [1] concerning a new less-forgiving approach we've adopted to glitches/errors. It's not the most polite way to run the project, and I apologize for any oversights and errors, but it's just a necessity since we don't have expertise in everything.
With Grails specifically, a very late PR arrived that unfortunately broke the test implementation for us, so we removed it from the Round 7 test. We aim to push new rounds on a monthly cycle, so I hope that anything that is missing in one round won't be missing very long.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6650136 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6650136
- jacques_chester 13y agoPerhaps you could add a second table on each page of "Did Not Complete" entries. Because people just aren't going to read the notes. They'll skip to the results.
- bhauer 13y agoThat is a good idea. I'll add that to the GitHub issues.