3 ms·
My first comment here (as an Atheist) would have to do with the fact that: If you believe in the Christian "creation" story you don't believe that the world is
by mattkrea 13y ago
My first comment here (as an Atheist) would have to do with the fact that:
If you believe in the Christian "creation" story you don't believe that the world is 4.5 billion (give or take a few hundred) years old. This would be a fairly significant problem for someone calling himself or herself a scientist yet while being a religious person.
The bigger thing for me is that I see no facts surrounding it. So, I see people that I know taking this on faith and that, to me, is a fundamental flaw in their thinking.
I think most people out there understand why religion exists and I agree with many of your points here but I still believe that it is fundamentally wrong.
Humans used to believe lightning and fire was caused by a god until we understood what actually caused it. Give it a few thousands years and I think we'll be much further along.
This is not to say that I go out of my way to attack it but I surely will fight if someone presses it on me.
- skrebbel 13y agoDid you read the article at all?
- russellsprouts 13y agoBut you don't have to believe in the literal Christian creation story 7000 years ago. Most lines of Christian thought allowed for non-literal accounts as far back as the first century A.D.
- mattkrea 13y agoBelieve me I'm aware of that. I always sort of felt that picking and choosing the parts of a religion in which you believe is almost worst, however.
- xherberta 13y agoThe Hebrew term "Yom" translated "day" is mentioned before the sun and moon. Also, there's an unspecified amount of time between Genesis 1:1, when "God created the heavens and the earth" and 1:2, which says "But the earth became waste and emptiness." These two clues tell me the text is not meant to offer any information about dates and times.