4 ms·

I think that the colloquial use of the term "average" actually means the median. That's how I have seen it used, anyway.

• maxerickson 13y ago
  No, people usually have the arithmetic mean in mind.
  • Swizec 13y ago
    People have the arithmetic mean in mind, but their intuition of "average" is actually the median, or even more commonly the modus. When somebody says "Average people are X", they usually mean "Most people I've encountered are X", which is the modus. Hell, I just did that in this exact sentence!
    • Qom 13y ago
      I like how we've totally ignored the guy's arguments due to some technicality in his post. That's Hacker News for you!
      • deleted 13y ago
        [deleted]
  • meepmorp 13y ago
    I think the colloquial meaning of average is "typical". Sometimes that's the mean and the median, and often, an hazy combination of the two.
• mati 13y ago
  In my experience very few people even know what "median" is, so they usually mean tha arithmetic average.
• Jtsummers 13y ago
  That's how it's often used. People might say something like, "half the people are below average". But if you ask the same person: What's the average of [4,5,9,10,10]? They'd answer 7.6 (after doing the math). This dual meaning creates confusion, and its why, at least those reporting on things, should clarify whether they mean the mean or the median. Similarly, as the old adage goes, there are lies, damn lies, and statistics. People will take advantage of the misperception of "average" and report a mean as "the average", even though it hides the truth. For instance, around here people refer to the "average" income, some number like 50-60k, when the median income is actually around 40k. Or the average government employee salary, when again the median works out to be lower than the mean, which is what they report(here, won't claim mean is always greater than median as it can obviously be skewed either way).
  • mcv 13y ago
    I think a lot of people blindly assume a standard distribution (where medium and average are the same) because that's very often correct.
    • Jtsummers 13y ago
      That doesn't absolve those responsible for reporting figures (or misreporting figures) of the responsibility of clarity. Mean and median are often quite distinct, especially in economic and financial figures, and reporting one as the other because it makes the point they're going for is disingenuous. Another instance of statistics reporting abuse: doing <something> will increase your risk of <something> by <some percent>. It totally ignores that the original odds were so far against it ever happening that that increase may be double the risk or even 5 times, but it's still 1 in a million odds. Since the typical person has little more than a high school level of mathematics, and probably not a statistical course in that, they're easily thrown off by this sort of reporting.
• saraid216 13y ago
  This is because not everyone is taught statistics.