3 ms·
And for at least 1.7 million people last year, they were? http://www.cnbc.com/id/101099732 http://www.cnbc.com/id/101099732
by cobrausn 13y ago
And for at least 1.7 million people last year, they were?
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101099732 http://www.cnbc.com/id/101099732
- MaysonL 13y agoAnd of course if you look at the economic performance of the US under R administrations, vs D administrations, the Rs win by a hundred miles. /s
- jaynos 13y agoUnless you actually look at economic performance. [1]http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-25/democratic-presidents-are-better-for-the-economy.html http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-25/democratic-presiden... [2]http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/post/economy-has-grown-the-most-when-democrats-have-been-in-power/2012/04/09/gIQA1VhS6S_blog.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/post/economy-ha...
- MaysonL 13y agoAs the /s was meant to indicate. :) (Thanks for the links).