3 ms·
Generally the value in recruiters is in passive candidates and not active ones so in those cases it's unlikely that the candidate is working with a significant
by ig1 13y ago
Generally the value in recruiters is in passive candidates and not active ones so in those cases it's unlikely that the candidate is working with a significant number of recruiters.
Even in the case that a candidate works with multiple recruiters they'll generally all have "preferred clients" who get first look at candidates. And at 15% you're unlikely to be a preferred client for any recruiter except the bottom-feeders who spam every CV to every client.
And you don't want any bottom-feeder recruiter to have your CV because many companies have a policy of instantly rejecting any candidate that comes in through multiple recruiters because they don't want to get into a legal dispute over priority.
The recruitment market is a fairly complex one (I had a startup in the space so I've been neck deep in understanding how the different players interact).
(You're right that if you're recruiting for lots of roles you can get a discount, but it's a tricky path, you really need to exchange information with industry competitors to get a good idea if you're being passed over for good candidates. In some industries like banking this does happen albeit on a semi-informal basis)
- kamjam 13y agoFair enough, and thanks for all the info. I've never directly recruited, but I've heard the 15% touted by my ex-employers. Certainly for headhunters 30% is more normal. To me as a employee though I don't care what the rate is, it's a negotiation between the recruiter and the employer.