3 ms·
Former federal IT security contractor here. There's nothing unusual about this event, except perhaps the fact that it's receiving national attention. When I wo
by mcone 13y ago
Former federal IT security contractor here. There's nothing unusual about this event, except perhaps the fact that it's receiving national attention.
When I worked for the federal agency responsible for providing health care services to tribal entities, we would routinely accept and issue waivers for high-level risks discovered in RPMS (called VistA at the VA), the 30-year-old EHR application we used to store PHI and PII. Honestly, I don't know why we even bothered performing C&As and penetration tests -- everybody knew we weren't going to mitigate the vulnerabilities, even before we started testing for them.
It was an incredibly frustrating environment to work in. Federal law required us to test for vulnerabilities, but the director and CIO didn't give a shit about infosec and the CISO just kept issuing waivers for everything.
- generj 13y ago> the federal agency responsible for providing health care services to tribal entities Wouldn't that be the IHS, which is underneath HHS? Suggesting a general disdain for security within the HHS? Healthcare.gov is underneath CMS, not IHS, but I don't think it's unreasonable to conclude that the overarching body, HHS, has poor security practices.