2 ms·
I disagree. Most people need to drive to work and most people need to work to eat. Permanent revocation will just create more unlicensed, uninsured drivers. Thi
by yardie 13y ago
I disagree. Most people need to drive to work and most people need to work to eat. Permanent revocation will just create more unlicensed, uninsured drivers. This has the unintended consequence of putting more burden on regular drivers (who pay hire premiums) and the state (which has to pay for incarceration).
This is why California and Florida, places with high undocumented immigrant populations, have such high insurance rates. Not only am I paying a premium on my driving I'm also paying a premium on the guy not insured at all.
- dllthomas 13y ago> Most people need to drive to work I'm not sure that's actually true. Most people live in cities. It may very well be the case, though, that most people driving need to drive to work, which is probably sufficient for your argument.