3 ms·
well, i truly doubt that the law mandates for male coverage to include maternity or female coverage - prostate cancer. The law just mandates the same insurance
by VladRussian2 13y ago
well, i truly doubt that the law mandates for male coverage to include maternity or female coverage - prostate cancer. The law just mandates the same insurance price for males and females.
It is pretty much the same as me paying [through taxes] for the FDA beef inspectors even though i don't eat beef. Just a socialization of the cost of basic government services (healthcare is among them, it is just Republicans are slower as usual to recognize the facts of reality, and thus "socialization" of the cost happens inside an insurance pool instead of society-wide as it would be in the case of single-payer )
- Turing_Machine 13y ago"well, i truly doubt that the law mandates for male coverage to include maternity or female coverage - prostate cancer." You're wrong. The law says what the policy has to cover. Whether the policy holder is male or female doesn't enter into it. "It is pretty much the same as me paying [through taxes] for the FDA beef inspectors" Really? Since when is the FDA (actually, USDA in this case) a private, for-profit operation?
- VladRussian2 13y ago>Really? Since when is the FDA (actually, USDA in this case) a private, for-profit operation? i already addressed that - the Republicans forced for it to be done through private for-profit operations instead of a government agency like FDA/USDA/etc...