Imagine the outcry if all punishments were meted out on this kind of scale. Jaywalking: 10 years hard labour! And no, I wouldn't steal a purse, because a purse

Imagine the outcry if all punishments were meted out on this kind of scale. Jaywalking: 10 years hard labour! And no, I wouldn't steal a purse, because a purse is a physical object, owned by an ordinary individual human being, who would be materially and emotionally harmed by the theft. This case of Copyright infringement involves imaginary property of enormously rich corporations who would not be materially affected by it in any measurable way. It's more akin to stealing an invisible mote of dust from the bottom of someones purse, without them being aware of it at any point. All the evidence actually suggests that music sharing increases income for commercial music as a whole, yet sharing these 24 tracks has resulted in a $2m fine. Ironically, you would be punished enormously less for actually mugging someone and stealing their purse.