I quite agree. This is a very poor discussion of the ideas and concepts at hand. Its not even an 'introductory' level discussion; most of it is just plain unin

I quite agree. This is a very poor discussion of the ideas and concepts at hand. Its not even an 'introductory' level discussion; most of it is just plain uninformed. Personally, my first reading has led me to find the conclusions quite distasteful. I'm not sure a common carrier like Facebook should go taking sides, as the author seems to be suggesting. I consider there to be a significant difference between institutions (i.e. Facebook) taking sides and people (i.e. a host of a party). The internet, with a little searching, can supply far better arguments about free speech than this.