There's interesting points to be made regarding government regulation of free speech vs. market actors, but this article makes none of them. There are important

There's interesting points to be made regarding government regulation of free speech vs. market actors, but this article makes none of them. There are important questions about who can make judgments about what speech is worthy of protection and what speech is not, and the article addresses none of them. If I were a high school civics teacher, I'd give it a C for at least being aware what the keywords to mention are, but no higher because it displays no understanding of the issues.