4 ms·
I don't think that's necessarily a major roadblock. Depending on implementation, with peer to peer you may connect to many peers, and their combined bandwidth
by vectorjohn 13y ago
I don't think that's necessarily a major roadblock. Depending on implementation, with peer to peer you may connect to many peers, and their combined bandwidth will be good.
Another way of looking at it: if I used 100% of my upload traffic continuously, it would be a lot more total data sent than I generally download with normal use. So as long as a peer to peer system ensures QoS, the bandwidth is there. I think.
- loup-vaillant 13y agoNope. On a peer to peer network, download equals upload. If you arrive late, sure, everyone will upload to you. But if you arrive in the middle of the viral explosion, you won't be the only one who wants to download. Peers will upload to each other, not just you. So, unless one of the peers happen to be a big fat server with monstrous upload, you won't download the video much faster than the median upload rate. The idea of using your uplink to the fullest sounds good, but to do that, you need to acquire some content in the first place. And that requires the upload bandwidth of other peers…