3 ms·
whoa, I'd never really thought this one out, but it seems so obvious and yet so full of potential for misuse. How do people see this being (ab)used in the post
by theblackbox 17y ago
whoa, I'd never really thought this one out, but it seems so obvious and yet so full of potential for misuse. How do people see this being (ab)used in the post Opera unite era? I can only imagine the horror...
- inerte 17y agoEr, ok... assuming that by "post Opera unite era" you mean people running servers on their machine to share content, why adding framed stuff to the mix make it so horrifying? I guess I'm lacking imagination or the right security mindset here :)
- theblackbox 17y agoFrom what I gathered of the Opera unite stuff I read, it would be possible to issue server-server commands and chain sessions between each(?). I figured this could be twisted enough to make most authorizing protocols obsolete in light of framing the victims /server/.... dunno though, I was asking a genuine question to the community, I do that sometimes.... let's say for instance you frame/"clickjack" 129.168.0.10 which happens to be there router config page? could that actually be done and if so at what cost? do it on a large scale and you're bound to get the people who use their hotmail password for their router.... just winging it, but I thought it was worth learning about in open conversation