2 ms·
This is true but I take it in a different direction than you probably do. Most of the help we give to the unemployed is contingent on two things: 1. They don
by einhverfr 13y ago
This is true but I take it in a different direction than you probably do.
Most of the help we give to the unemployed is contingent on two things:
1. They don't have income and
2. They are looking for a job.
That seems like a great way to test for unemployment benefits but what it fundamentally does is ensure that if you are unemployed and need the help you can't try to supplement through self-employment. Thus our current unemployment assistance largely works to discourage new businesses from starting.
A better system would be a mandatory severance system where if you find yourself unemployed, you get a lump sum. You can look for a job, become self-employed, try to start a business with it, or any combination of these. But when it is gone, it is gone.
- dlp211 13y agoI'd like to point out that many states do in fact allow you to supplement your unemployment income with some form of employment income.
- capisce 13y agoIn fact basic income would provide both better incentives for those without a job and increase liquidity in the employment market since people would no longer have to suffer a crappy boss or work place out of fear.