3 ms·
I wish HN contributors were more careful with their link titles. The actual article title, "End Hypocrisy with Leaks," is altogether different, and inestimably
by jfmercer 13y ago
I wish HN contributors were more careful with their link titles. The actual article title, "End Hypocrisy with Leaks," is altogether different, and inestimably more reasonable, than the absurdly titled "The End of Hypocrisy."
- herbig 13y agoFrom the linked page: "Foreign Affairs, November-December 2013 The End of Hypocrisy" Published: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/140155/henry-farrell-and-martha-finnemore/the-end-of-hypocrisy http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/140155/henry-farrell-...
- jrajav 13y ago"The End of Hypocrisy" is the actual title of the article, as you can see a few lines down in the linked post and wherever it is published elsewhere: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/140155/henry-farrell-and-martha-finnemore/the-end-of-hypocrisy http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/140155/henry-farrell-... "End Hypocrisy with Leaks" is in fact the editorial title of this Cryptome site.
- 001sky 13y agoThe FA Title is (actually): The End of Hypocrisy: American Foreign Policy in the Age of Leaks You can't discount the context of the subheading in a written/paper published title. IMHO. I don't think this is pedantic, as the linked article made it fit (which is why HN guidelines say you should try not to editorialize).
- knappador 13y agoRight. "The End of Hypocrisy" sounds pretty pretentious and hypocritical in itself. I'm all against banana republicanism and 40,000 other things sovereign states and corporations do, but to be the "End," the author would have to be swinging around some very impressive voodoo.