3 ms·
Not wishing to dispute your research... but perhaps you talk to people who use Linux and I talk to people who use Solaris? The reasons I use Solaris are that I
by bensummers 17y ago
Not wishing to dispute your research... but perhaps you talk to people who use Linux and I talk to people who use Solaris?
The reasons I use Solaris are that I'm uncomfortable with the Linux development model of "unplanned latest and greatest" and the BSDs aren't so hot on systems with lots of cores. This basically leaves Solaris.
It's definitely an OS worth looking at. Not just for the features (ZFS you mentioned, DTrace you didn't) but for the quality engineering, and support if you ever need it.
- moe 17y agoThat's why I said I think... ;-) To each their own ofcourse and yes, I did forget about DTrace which would indeed be another killer feature. But after that it gets a bit dark in the unique features bag, or did I miss something else? There will always be die-hard solaris fans (just like we have them for every OS) but when we're talking about sheer mass adoption then I don't see it entering mainstream again - unless something more significant than OpenSolaris happens.
- bensummers 17y agoI count stability and good engineering as a feature. I suppose there's nothing which would necessarily compel anyone to adopt it, but there's a nice sense of integration between everything. Once you've got the hang of Solaris, everything "just works" and fits nicely together. ZFS integrates with zones which integrate with resource caps which integrate with SMF which integrates ... etc. I would be very surprised if OpenSolaris displaced Linux, but I suspect it'll always have a place in the world. The BSDs are still around and healthy, and innovating quite nicely amongst themselves. Linux seems to be a default choice rather than something you choose to use. I also hear some people run Windows on servers, although I can't quite believe it myself.