5 ms·
Indeed (author here). Aside from Fibonacci being a worthless benchmark, the Common Lisp code was unoptimized and running on CLISP(!) on Windows(!!). Moreover, i
by eudox 13y ago
Indeed (author here). Aside from Fibonacci being a worthless benchmark, the Common Lisp code was unoptimized and running on CLISP(!) on Windows(!!). Moreover, it was from an old version of the compiler. The benchmark just sat there for a while as I rewrote it from C++ in Common Lisp, and it was stupid of me to let it hang around for so long.
- agumonkey 13y agoside note: as long as your jitted-llvm time is correct, then it speaks for itself, people shouldn't really care how much faster hylas is compared to any lisp implementation (even though it's in the chart). ps: I really like the WSL side of things, as a lispos/lispmachine daydreamer, I'm impatient to see bare metal lisp systems running (fast).