4 ms·
Please tell me where the "written accounts with editorial responsibility" are for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_(programming_language) http://en.wikipedia.org
by jimktrains2 13y ago
Please tell me where the "written accounts with editorial responsibility" are for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_(programming_language) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_(programming_language) (I only see one that fits your criteria from InformationWeek, does that one reference mean the rest of the page should be deleted? and just one or two sentences kept?). And before you say OSE, should Go not be in Wikipedia?
Perhaps we simply have very different and incompatible goals of what we want Wikipedia to be.
Also, Wikipedia already puts rel=nofollow in its links. Also, why would someone want their site to appear at the top of Google for a term noöne uses? If they really push and advertise the term enough to make that worth-while, then it'll get talked about in other venues as well.
- tptacek 13y agoThe article makes a direct assertion of notability: it's the product of Ken Thompson and Rob Pike (both already notable), and is in use in production systems at Google. It backs both claims up with reliable sources. And then, yes, it also includes stories from TechCrunch and Information Week, in addition to the TIOBE Language of the Year thing. It's funny you brought it up, because Golang was nominated for AfD (go look at the Talk page), and even more sources were found; they just apparently weren't relevant to the article. On the other hand: nobody seems to be able to find any sources for Nimrod.