3 ms·
A key part of Turing's computability paper hinges on the diagonal argument. It's really well covered in 'The Annotated Turing' by Charles Petzold. In Cantor's
by ColinDabritz 13y ago
A key part of Turing's computability paper hinges on the diagonal argument. It's really well covered in 'The Annotated Turing' by Charles Petzold.
In Cantor's version, we prove that numbers (real numbers?) are not enumerable by creating a new number.
In Turing's paper, he enumerates all valid Turing machines in a similar way, but crucially, we can't know if the new constructed machine is valid or not, so the outcome is different.
It's quite possible I'm botching elements of these, but it was a beautiful read.
- thaumasiotes 13y ago> In Cantor's version, we prove that numbers (real numbers?) are not enumerable in the standard diagonalization, you just prove that the reals in the interval (0, 1) are uncountable; that proof is very simple to state and then you can argue that (0, 1) is a subset of the reals so the real line must be uncountable too.