Where did I say that the state of affairs is innate to Argentina? In any case, that's a red herring. You can't simply state that the economic policies unilate

Where did I say that the state of affairs is innate to Argentina? In any case, that's a red herring. You can't simply state that the economic policies unilaterally led to corruption as a self-evident truth without some supporting evidence. Clearly officials who have a history of corruption are more likely to institute new policies that benefit themselves as well. Economies are not so simple that causality is easily stated in an absolute manner, especially in so flippant a manner as "corruption […] is a function […] of something inherently unfair". That's probably the most hand-wavy statement about such a grand topic that I've ever read.