3 ms·
I agree. But it's something. She was adamantly opposed before this, actively preventing any members in her committee from answering basic questions about overs
by generj 13y ago
I agree.
But it's something. She was adamantly opposed before this, actively preventing any members in her committee from answering basic questions about oversight. She steamrolled over any objections Udall might have had, for instance.
The fact she acknowledges anything wrong with the NSA at all is a reversal for her. I'm hoping it will serve as flag for other Senators to vote for comprehensive reform legislation that's being introduced this week.