I can see why some would argue it violates the Commerce Clause. But interstate commerce has been well contorted for a long time to the desires of the feds (e.g

I can see why some would argue it violates the Commerce Clause. But interstate commerce has been well contorted for a long time to the desires of the feds (e.g. marijuana) and states (e.g. alcohol). The North Carolina position is most likely a sign of things to come as state revenues continue to decline. The choice is simple from a state perspective: follow a strict interpretation of the constitution or have funds to open public schools this fall.