3 ms·
I really appreciate you posting this information. I had considered Gandi in the past and would not have read their ToS; I'll stay away now. As for our friend j
by ogreyonder 13y ago
I really appreciate you posting this information. I had considered Gandi in the past and would not have read their ToS; I'll stay away now.
As for our friend jjblue, you can safely ignore his citation trolling. The rest of us appreciate the warning. There's no point in waiting for victim #1 before telling your friends about danger. Thanks again!
- Maxious 13y agoDeviant uses is defined as "spamming, phishing, hacking, cracking, or attempts at hacking or cracking". That's a pretty standard ToS right?
- dangrossman 13y agoNot at all. Neither is that the extent of the agreement. You agree that you will not use your domain to distribute any information in violation of their ethical code. You agree that you'll also police any 3rd parties with the ability to publish content (i.e. blog comments or forum posts). The list of things you can't talk about on your site include anything "prejudicial", not just illegal. It includes any discussion that doesn't respect the "image" and "honor" of any other person. It includes any discussion inappropriate to the "age and sensibility" of anyone the site is meant to be read by. That's all from section 3.3 of the agreement. Making your ownership of your domain name contingent upon active monitoring and censorship to uphold ambiguous "moral standards" of a 3rd party is NOT a standard registrar ToS.