3 ms·
> 3.794 million square miles (9.827 million km²) That's only area of USA. He was talking about the cities which have terrible conditions for transport by feet.
by nagisa 13y ago
> 3.794 million square miles (9.827 million km²)
That's only area of USA. He was talking about the cities which have terrible conditions for transport by feet.
Or maybe should I give a counter-example of Russia (17 million km²) which is comparably fine albeit not being designed for cars?
- Zikes 13y agoSome cities are better for this than others. Unfortunately many of them were built in the automotive boom where futurists predicted compact roads would dominate the ground level and everyone else would walk underground or in sky bridges between buildings. Maybe we'll grow into a reasonable solution for pedestrian traffic in cities, but the population distribution outside of those cities absolutely necessitate a car to get around. The Russian counter-example may be valid. Offhand I would wonder how much of that 17 million km² is actually habitable, but even halving that still puts it on roughly equal footing with USA. Having never visited Russia I have no idea how it compares with pedestrian traffic vs vehicular, except the craziness I see on the dashcam videos that have been popping up everywhere lately. Maybe we have a few things we could learn from them, but the point I was trying to make was that one 9.827 million km² country has to be architected rather differently from one at 84,421 km².