3 ms·
Being able to set a very high limit for my history file and to share history between instances is a major usability feature in zsh for me. Not being able to do
by djur 13y ago
Being able to set a very high limit for my history file and to share history between instances is a major usability feature in zsh for me. Not being able to do that is honestly reason enough to rule out an alternative shell.
- berdario 13y ago250k items is not enough for your history file? Also, fish shares the history between the shells out of the box, unlike zsh... but it chose to do it in a different way (that is, commands are available even if one of the shells hasn't been closed, unlike bash... but they aren't available right away after entering a single new command, like most zsh configurations that I've seen)