Agree completely. I stopped reading the article as soon as he claimed he worked for news organizations that were "impartial". It's amazing that they fail to see

Agree completely. I stopped reading the article as soon as he claimed he worked for news organizations that were "impartial". It's amazing that they fail to see just how biased their impartiality really is. To be completely neutral would mean you only state facts that have real meaning in the physical world, not in our heads. For instance, the mere mention of a "nation" is a bias, because nations do not have a real physical existence, they are merely ideas created by man, and which many other man has decided to go along with, but there are a few who disagree. Our entire social structure is built around ideas, but all reporting talks about these ideas like they're real, irrefutable concepts. You can't be impartial until you're open minded enough to reject any idea and accept possible alternatives.