4 ms·
Wow, a double negative! Does this mean that the article shows how to prove that P is equal to NP? :P
by jackmaney 13y ago
Wow, a double negative! Does this mean that the article shows how to prove that P is equal to NP? :P
- foldr 13y agoNo, because the the two negatives don't cancel out in this case. "I didn't prove that 3 isn't prime" doesn't mean the same thing as "I proved that 3 is prime" (because one negation is in the matrix clause and the other is in the embedded clause).
- jackmaney 13y agoYes, hence the emoticon.
- Helianthus 13y ago>P is equal to NP? :P I thought it was a poorly constructed ternary operator? :D
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]