3 ms·
Hmm? This is basic practice, and if it's in the contract, what's so bad? They /agreed/ to these terms in advance as far as I'm aware, who are you to tell the o
by microcolonel 13y ago
Hmm? This is basic practice, and if it's in the contract, what's so bad?
They /agreed/ to these terms in advance as far as I'm aware, who are you to tell the other employees(who didn't complain) that their contract should've been avoided?
- talmand 13y agoMost non-compete clauses are invalid in California. This "agreement" was an attempt to get around that law. Also, the reason it's a federal case, this "agreement" was done amongst the employers without the consent of the employees. If it were not California, and there actually was a non-compete in their contracts then you may have had a point. There's a major difference between you agreeing to not compete and your employer actively preventing you from obtaining alternative employment.