In practice, it usually means that I start sending more and more work to the better workers until there is little work left for the worker that doesn't perform

In practice, it usually means that I start sending more and more work to the better workers until there is little work left for the worker that doesn't perform as well. I guess you could think of it like a load balancer distributing work. If there is a worker that is less responsive or sending poorer results than the rest, then you start sending less and less work to them. Ultimately, you run out of work for them since it's all going to the higher performers. At that point, there's no point in continuing the contract with the lower performer. So, then I will let them know and end the contract and give them the best review and feedback I can while still being honest about their performance. It's worth noting again that these are short-term part-time contracts, so this already fits within the contractor's expectations. They don't expect this job to last forever and they're generally not too heartbroken if a contract ends. They are often working on multiple contacts simultaneously, so mine is just one of several contracts. Ultimately all contracts end, even for the best workers. The nice thing about hiring temporary contractors is that their expectations are already set that this is a temporary engagement.